In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are evaluated, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. Today, in test tasks, it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or to find two correct answers from the proposed ones (tasks 1 and 15), or to name the numbers indicating the correct setting of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which errors were made.
|
1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect one |
0 to 2 points |
0 to 4 points |
0 to 5 points |
|
For the correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23, the examinee |
For completing tasks 1 and 15, from 0 to 2 points can be set. |
Task 24 can be assigned from 0 to 4 points. Faithful |
Task 7 can be assigned from 0 to 5 points. Faithful |
|
Maximum Points |
|||
|
Minimum Points |
|||
Criteria for evaluating an essay
|
Points |
||
|
Statement of source text problems |
||
|
The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem. |
||
|
The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. |
||
|
Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examiner is commented. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented, no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text. |
||
|
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented, more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text, commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a comment, a large fragment of the original text is cited as comments. |
||
|
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text. |
||
|
Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature). |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience), conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life or reading experience. |
||
|
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, the examinee's opinion is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), not reflected in the work at all. |
||
|
SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY |
||
|
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; There are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work. |
||
|
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, more than 1 logical error was made, There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text. |
||
|
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought. |
||
|
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech. |
||
|
LITERACY |
||
|
Compliance with spelling rules |
||
|
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error) |
||
|
1-2 mistakes made |
||
|
more than 2-3 mistakes made |
||
| more than 3 errors | 0 | |
|
Compliance with punctuation rules |
||
|
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error) |
||
|
made 1-2 mistakes |
||
|
made 2-3 mistakes |
||
| more than 3 errors | 0 | |
|
Language Compliance |
||
|
no grammatical errors |
||
|
made 1-2 mistakes |
||
|
more than 2 errors |
||
|
Compliance with speech norms |
||
|
no more than 1 speech error |
||
|
made 2-3 mistakes |
||
|
more than 3 errors |
||
|
Ethical Compliance |
||
|
there are no ethical errors in the work |
||
|
ethical mistakes made (1 or more) |
||
|
Maintain factual accuracy in background material |
||
|
there are no factual errors in the background material |
||
|
factual errors (1 or more) in the background material |
||
|
Maximum score per essay |
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are scored, the task is considered failed.
When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.
The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.
If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.
In accordance with the Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs of secondary general education (order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 03, 2014 No. 31205) “61. Based on the results of the first and second checks, the experts independently assign points for each answer to the tasks of the USE examination paper with a detailed answer ... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by the two experts, a third check is assigned. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The expert who carries out the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment items for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.
After checking the USE assignments in the Russian language, the initial score for their implementation is set: from 0 to 57. Each assignment is evaluated by a certain number of points: the more difficult the assignment, the more points you can get for it. For the correct performance of tasks in the USE in the Russian language, from 1 to 5 points are given, depending on the complexity of the task. At the same time, you can get from 0 to 24 points for an essay.
After that, the primary score is converted into a test score, which is indicated in the USE certificate. It is this score that is used for admission to higher educational institutions. Translation of USE scores carried out using a special scoring scale.
Also, according to the score for the Unified State Examination, you can determine the approximate grade on a five-point scale that a student would receive for completing tasks in the Russian language in the exam.
Below is USE scores translation scale in Russian: Primary scores, test scores and a rough estimate.
USE score translation scale: Russian
The minimum test score for admission to higher educational institutions in the Russian language is 36.
| Primary score | Test score | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 24 | 3 |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 41 | |
| 21 | 43 | |
| 22 | 44 | |
| 23 | 45 | |
| 24 | 46 | |
| 25 | 48 | |
| 26 | 49 | |
| 27 | 50 | |
| 28 | 51 | |
| 29 | 53 | |
| 30 | 54 | |
| 31 | 55 | |
| 32 | 56 | |
| 33 | 57 | 4 |
| 34 | 59 | |
| 35 | 60 | |
| 36 | 61 | |
| 37 | 62 | |
| 38 | 64 | |
| 39 | 65 | |
| 40 | 66 | |
| 41 | 67 | |
| 42 | 69 | |
| 43 | 70 | |
| 44 | 71 | |
| 45 | 72 | 5 |
| 46 | 73 | |
| 47 | 76 | |
| 48 | 78 | |
| 49 | 81 | |
| 50 | 83 | |
| 51 | 86 | |
| 52 | 88 | |
| 53 | 91 | |
| 54 | 93 | |
| 55 | 96 | |
| 56 | 98 | |
| 57 | 100 |
JUDGING CRITERIA
EXAM IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE IN 11 CLASS (USE)
For the right execution all assignments examination work can be obtained as much as possible 55 primary points.
For the right execution everyone tasks parts 1 (except tasks 7, 15 and 24) the graduate receives 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, 0 points are set.
For fulfillment tasks 7 can be exhibited from 0 to 5 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (5 points: no errors; 4 points: 1 mistake was made; 3 points: 2 mistakes were made; 2 points: 2 digits are correctly indicated; 1 point: correctly indicated only one digit, 0 points: completely wrong answer, i.e. incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence). The order in which the numbers are written in the answer matters.
For fulfillment tasks 15 can be exhibited from 0 to 2 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number of the answer, the examiner receives 1 point. If 2 numbers are correct, the examiner gets 2 points.
For fulfillment tasks 24 can be exhibited from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the term number from the list, the examinee receives 1 point (4 points: no errors; 3 points: 1 mistake was made; 2 points: 2 mistakes were made; 1 point: only one digit is correctly indicated; 0 points: a completely incorrect answer, i.e. an incorrect sequence of numbers or its absence.The order of writing the numbers in the answer matters.
Maximum Points, which can be obtained by a student who correctly completed the task part 2, is 23 points.
Criteria for evaluating a task with a detailed answer (essay)
Criteria for evaluating the answer to task C1
Points
I
Essay content
K1
Statement of source text problems
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text.
There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
1
The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text.
0
K2
Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text
The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. Factual errors related to understanding the problem of the source text, no comments
2
The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented,or
more than 1 factual error related to the understanding of the source text was made in the comments, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner,or
a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as comments,
or
a large piece of source text is cited as comments
0
K3
The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem.
There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
1
0
K4
Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature)
3
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge, life experience), or cited only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature
2
The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life experience
1
The examinee formulated his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, or the opinion of the examinee is stated only formally (for example: “I agree / disagree with the author”), or the opinion of the examinee is not reflected at all in the work
0
II
Speech design of the essay
K5
Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation:
- there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not violated;
– there are no violations of paragraph articulation in the text
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work
1
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible,
but more than 1 logical error was made,
and/or
there are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text
0
K6
Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
*The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to the criterion K10
2
The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought
1
The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.
0
III
Literacy
K7
Compliance with spelling rules
no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)
3
no more than 2 errors were made
2
3-4 mistakes made
1
more than 4 mistakes made
0
K8
Compliance with punctuation rules
no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)
3
1-3 mistakes made
2
4–5 errors were made
1
more than 5 mistakes made
0
K9
Language Compliance
no grammatical errors
2
1-2 mistakes made
1
more than 2 mistakes made
0
K10
Compliance with speech norms
no more than 1 speech error
2
2-3 mistakes made
1
more than 3 mistakes made
0
K11
Ethical Compliance
there are no ethical errors in the work
1
ethical mistakes made (1 or more)
0
K12.
Maintain factual accuracy in background material
there are no factual errors in the background material
1
factual errors (1 or more) in the background material
0
Maximum points for the entire written work (K1-K12)
When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words.
If the essay has less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is evaluated with zero points, the task is considered failed.
When evaluating an essay by volume 70 to 150 words number of allowed errors four types (K7–K10) decreases.
2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or 1 minor mistake was made);
K8 - no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than 2 errors were made;
K8 - 1-3 mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than 1 speech error was made.
Highest mark according to the criteria K7–K12 for volume work 70 to 150 words not put.
If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is evaluated by zero points.
If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU,
GRADUATES!
At the end of May, 11th grade graduates will face a rather difficult test - USE in Russian language 2017. This exam is considered mandatory, the same as mathematics, so everyone will have to take it without exception. To date, the main task for eleventh graders is timely preparation for the test so that the certificate is not spoiled by a bad grade. In addition, a high score for the Unified State Examination in the Russian language opens the door to the most prestigious universities in the country for the future applicant.
Most students, assuming that the tests in the Russian language are not as difficult as mathematics or physics, do not prepare for the subject at all and, as a result, receive insufficiently high scores. It must be remembered that the exam covers not only materials for grade 11, but also topics from previous years of study. In addition, the exam includes such tasks that require extraordinary thinking. As you can see, the Russian language is not such an easy subject, and given the future, predicted for 2017, it will become even more difficult.
What should be prepared for?
The fact that tests in the Russian language are waiting for a number of innovations has been said more than once. For many years, scientists and teachers have been developing an optimal knowledge testing system that could reflect the real knowledge of students. In 2017, it is planned to introduce an oral part in the Unified State Examination in the Russian language. This has already been stated by Lyudmila Verbitskaya (head of the Russian Academy of Education).
At this stage, all the necessary transformations have already been developed. It remains only to understand how to rationally use them in this.
Until 2017, all students of general education schools took the Russian language in writing. The test form that was in the forms is, of course, a good thing, but it is not able to reflect the real knowledge of graduates, because they can simply guess the answer. But what about punctuation or spelling? Tests are not able to thoroughly show the literacy of the student.
The oral exam will help to identify gaps in knowledge, the ability to accurately express one's thoughts, put sentences out of words and conduct a narrative that is understandable to examiners.
In our time, the correct staging of speech is extremely important, especially in sectors of the economy. Any leader should be able to formulate tasks for subordinates, be able to express thoughts and convey their ideas to others. Just for this, every student must learn spelling, as well as learn the basics of oratory.
The oral block is far from all the changes that await the Russian language exam. In the upcoming 2017, officials intend to introduce a grading system for a control essay. Recall that at the moment, for the manifestation of creative abilities and the ability to logically build their own thoughts, the student received simply “pass” or “fail”.
Lyudmila Verbitskaya considers this an unfair approach, especially for those students who can show the level of their knowledge through an essay. Only the introduction of a clear assessment scale will help to clearly recognize the level of preparedness of the student and form a clear objective view of the exam.
Dates
Early exams will begin on May 25, 2017. Just during this period, eleventh-graders will be able to pass the Russian language. The main tests are scheduled for May 30. Retake for those who “flunked” the subject or want to increase their grade, there will be an opportunity to retake the exam on June 27th. The reserve days are April 15 and September 24.
Conducting the exam in the Russian language
To cope with all the tasks, students are given an hour. In the allotted time, it is necessary to solve all two blocks, which include 24 questions. The first block consists of questions that must be answered numerically or verbally. On the second form, students must write an essay on a given topic.
Evaluation scale
Back in 2015, for this test, you could get a “pass / fail”. Since 2016, points have appeared, the amount of which depended on the number of correct answers. From the table below, you can find out the exact number of points that you can get for a particular question.
The second part of the exam requires the student to show creativity and fluency in Russian. Note that essays are evaluated in a special way, so the examiner will not be surprised by grammar alone.
For a correctly completed second part of the exam, the student can earn 25 points. In general, for two blocks, the graduate will earn 57 points, to which points are added according to other criteria. Considering that the knowledge assessment system is 100 points, in order to understand what grade a student has earned, it is enough to refer to this scheme:
- 0 - 24 - "two"
- 25 - 57 - "troika"
- 58 - 71 - "four"
- from 72 - “five”
Note that the minimum number of points for admission to a university is only 36 points, but to obtain a certificate it is enough to score 24 points.
Materials for preparing for the exam in the Russian language
Now a mass of literature is published annually, which helps future graduates prepare for the exam. In addition, a lot of additional materials are provided for general access on the FIPI official website, namely:
- Demo version of the exam
- Task forms
- Training compilations
- Video consultations
Among the most optimal literature for preparation, it is worth highlighting the manual from the author Tsybulko I.P.
